Total Pageviews

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Memoir Assignment: (2/26/2012) From Jina Y., Ohio

Summary and Analysis:
The title of her work is Beyond Tears. It is about the author as a little girl (a toddler) having her pigtails yanked by a boy when she stomps hard on his foot. He starts to cry very loudly, and the adults rush to the scene. Of course, she is blamed, and she is asked to apologize. She will not, she says, because it is also the boy's fault. The teacher asks what he did, but she is too furious to respond. She is sent to the timeout chair, and feels extremely humiliated. At the reflection, she says she learned two things: that boys have cooties, and never to do anything you'll regret.

How Jina Accomplishes the Role of Storytelling and Memoir
*She does not say "said" like so many authors do. She uses some variation in this area.
*She uses onomatopoeia, something many excellent authors use.
*She writes the memoir from a 3 year old's view (of course adding her later reflections), with the behavior of the characters visibly like their ages.
*She shows what happened in the story, as well as her character's internal feelings (like how humiliated she was after the ordeal).  
*In the end, a reflection is included. She tells us the lessons she learned from the experience.

 How does this memoir appeal to me?
*She uses above average diction (what words are selected) and syntax (the way the words are used).
*The author talks about something significant to her where she actually learned something useful. Nothing like: "I learned spinach and vanilla ice cream just don't mix."
*She shows, not tells. Not "I was angry" but actually describing the anger.
*Even at three, she had a hunger for justice. And she was pretty accurate, too. 
*She uses other vocabulary in dialogue besides "said." My biggest peeve has been avoided!

Monday, February 13, 2012

Vietnam: Origin, American Involment, and Sides (2-13-2012)

Summary
The Vietnam War started in 1955 and ended in 1975. On one side was the Communist North Vietnam, and on the other side was the South Vietnam, supported by the US and other allies. This conflict occurred during the time of the Cold War, as well as during the US supported policy of containment- keeping Communism where it was and preventing it from spreading. North Vietnam wished to convert its southern counterpart into a Communist country, but this was counter to the policy of the US, and seeing this conflict as crucial America became involved. In the end, North Vietnam would prevail with the capture of Saigon (the capital of South Vietnam) in 1975. The US would withdraw from Indochina (the war dealt a great loss to the country, with nearly 60,000 troops lost as well), the dissolution of the former Republic of Vietnam, and the conversion of South Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia to communism (they also would join with North Vietnam to form a unified Vietnam).
Origins
During World War II, Indochina (Laos, Cambodia, and all of Vietnam) was occupied by the Japanese. To retaliate, Ho Chi Minh, a communist started a Nationalist Vietnamese movement in 1941 to expel the invaders. With a US ally and guerrilla (hit and run) tactics, Japan was forced to flee. After the war (in 1946), the French (the previous occupants) bombed Haiphong, entered Hanoi, and forcibly took over after failed negotiations. In 1954, the French were ousted the the Viet Minh (those in Vietnam working for Minh). It would be decided that the Viet Minh would rule a communist state in the north, and a republic would be in the south. Soon, war would occur between the opposing forces, with the Viet Cong's communists uprising in South Vietnam.
                                                      Opposite Sides
The Communists: these are the supporters of Ho Chi Minh, the peoples of North Vietnam, and had a great ally: Communist China. These people wished to unite Vietnam and render it a communist state. The Viet Cong, or National Liberation Front (NLF) was a communist group allied with the Viet Minh (communists in the north) and were actually located in South Vietnam, representing a communist minority in the region. They were allied with the communist's official People's Army of Vietnam, the army up north.
The Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam): this is the side that lost the war, despite the aid of the US and other capitalist countries. Ngo Dinh Diem and then Nguyen Van Thieu were the presidents of the country. After France retreated from Vietnam, Diem had launched a campaign against the last members of the Viet Minh in the south. This was a failed attempt to consolidate his rule. President Thieu continued the unsuccessful war against the communists, though Saigon would be taken in 1975.
Sources
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War
2. http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/vietnamwar/a/VietnamOrigins.htm
3. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/vietnam.htm

Monday, February 6, 2012

Let America Be America Again: An Analysis (2/6/2012)


The two perspectives of America shown in Langston Hughes’ poem are of the downtrodden man and the man with a rather sumptuous home. The former decries the American Dream (which in essence requires natural selection—one man achieves his dreams leaving the rest in the gutter), while the latter; rather unstated perspective is that of the man with silver buttons and a gold cane. The bleak picture of the decline of the American Dream is explored in the poem, with Langston drawing parallels between the vision of the plebeians (the majority) and his own identical perspective. His poem is in affect a response to the opinion purported by the rich: the American Dream is offered to everyone, and the American Dream is the epitome of perfection. Hughes’ world is much different than the one painted by the rich—everything, even the Roaring Twenties, are gilded.  The rich romp about, while the poor congregate, wondering how their bills for the month shall be paid. The American Dream is not, as the rich pretend, able to be achieved by most in a person’s lifetime. Like the caste system in India, the American Dream is a hereditary characteristic few can attain in their life. Like moths changing color, the acquirement of the American Dream requires mettle and a bit of luck. This is in essence what is described by Hughes. His picture of a perfect American Dream (or indeed America) is a land of equal opportunity, where the American Dream can be achieved by even the lowliest immigrant. The American Dream’s reality and vision blend directly into America’s reality and vision. Thus, Hughes criticizes the gilded aspect of the American Dream, attempted by the many and achieved by the few. The tone in the poem is a kind of musing anger. His words are strong, but he also muses about the future. Fitzgerald is similar in how he criticizes the American Dream, though he takes the perspective of the rich rather than Hughes taking the perspective of the poor. He shows the rich’s weaknesses, namely them being shallow and out of touch with the poor. In the modern world, this philosophy is more applicable than ever: we are in a long recession, income inequality has increased to unprecedented levels, prices of food and forms of energy are skyrocketing, and people are becoming more depressed. The American Dream can be achieved, but the cost (many damaged lives) would make many consider not getting it. The few win, the majority are just a carpet for the rich and successful to wipe their feet on.